Intro & Overall Ratings
Our Ratings
In comparing ZoogVPN and McAfee Safe Connect, ZoogVPN emerges as the superior option for users prioritizing privacy and streaming capabilities. Scoring 69.3% in our ratings, ZoogVPN outperforms McAfee Safe Connect which only scores 18.4%. ZoogVPN, based in Greece, offers a no-logging policy, a critical feature for users seeking anonymity. It also excels in bypassing geo-restrictions on streaming platforms like Netflix and Hulu. McAfee Safe Connect, however, offers a longer money-back guarantee period (30 days) and has an extensive server network, which may benefit users seeking speed and performance. Despite these advantages, its U.S. jurisdiction and lack of a no-logging policy may deter privacy-focused users. Therefore, from a user’s perspective, ZoogVPN presents a more balanced offering, particularly for those seeking robust privacy and unrestricted streaming access.
About Our VPN Rating Systems
Our reviews delve deeply into each VPN service, scrutinizing aspects such as privacy, customer feedback, pricing, and usability to provide well-rounded insights.
Ratings are based on our comprehensive research of 96 VPN companies. Out of 96 VPNs we reviewed, only 11 surpass the 75% threshold in our evaluation, while half of the reviewed services score below average (54.1%).
Why Read Our VPN Guide?
- Our VPN reviews are unbiased and data-driven. We are not affiliated to any of the VPN companies listed on this website.
- Our rating system covers diverse user needs. We delve deeply into each VPN service, scrutinizing aspects such as privacy, customer feedback, pricing, and usability to provide well-rounded insights.
Specifications: ZoogVPN vs McAfee Safe Connect
VPN Company | ZoogVPN | McAfee Safe Connect |
---|---|---|
Jurisdiction Country | Greece | United States |
Cheapest Price | $1.99/mo over 12-month subscription | $3.33/mo |
Monthly Price | $9.99 | $3.33 |
Money Back Guarantee | 7 days | 30 days |
No Logging Policy? | Yes | No |
Encryption | AES-256 | AES-256 |
Protocols | IKEv2/IPSec, Open VPN, and TLS VPN | IKEv2/IPSec, OpenVPN, and WireGuard |
Servers | 71 | (not stated) |
Servers Countries | 42 | 23 |
Simultaneous Connections | Unlimited devices | 5 devices |
Works in China? | Partially | Unlikely |
Smart DNS | No | No |
Kill Switch | Yes | No |
Browser Extension | No | No |
Double VPN | No | No |
Ads Blocking | No | No |
Split Tunneling | No | No |
Third Party Audit | – | 0 |
Customer Support | 24/7 Live Chat | 24/7 Live Chat, and Email |
Android App | Yes | Yes |
iOS App | Yes | Yes |
Unblock Streaming | Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, Netflix, Hulu, and HBO | – |
Learn More | Visit Online | Visit Online |
Cruical Features & Key Differences
Plans & Pricing: Tie
When it comes to finding a VPN that balances cost and performance, both ZoogVPN and McAfee Safe Connect stand out as strong contenders. With ZoogVPN priced at a competitive $1.99/mo and McAfee Safe Connect offering plans starting at $3.33/mo, these VPNs prove that enhanced online security and privacy can be achieved without stretching your budget. Both services underscore the principle that high-quality VPN protection need not come with a hefty price tag.
McAfee Safe Connect Plans
ZoogVPN Plans
Jurisdiction: ZoogVPN Better
The jurisdiction of their VPN provider is a critical consideration for those who prioritize online privacy. McAfee Safe Connect’s HQ is based in United States, a 14-Eye country; ZoogVPN’s on the other hand is based in Greece.
Bound by the stringent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, Greece provides a robust framework for data protection. And, being a country outside of the 14-Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance, Greece is less likely to share surveillance data with other countries. In contrast, United States, a country within the 14-Eyes Alliance, have more invasive surveillance programs and data-sharing agreements, potentially compromising individual privacy to a greater extent.
Understanding the 14-Eyes Alliance and Its Privacy Implications
The 14-Eyes Alliance, an expansion of the Five- and Nine-Eyes intelligence collaborations, includes countries like the USA, UK, Canada, and several European nations. These member states are known for their extensive surveillance activities, as highlighted by disclosures from figures like Edward Snowden (watch video below). Such surveillance extends to the sharing of collected data among member countries.
The presence of a VPN provider in a 14-Eyes country could mean legal obligations to surrender user data to government entities, with the potential for this data to circulate among the alliance members. This surveillance culture not only compromises personal privacy but also raises concerns about digital security, particularly with the push for encryption backdoors.
In result, Greece-base ZoogVPN ffers a lower risk of government-led surveillance and is likely the better choice in term of data privacy and security.
Servers Count & Geographical Coverage: McAfee Safe Connect Better
The server fleet size of ZoogVPN and McAfee Safe Connect is a critical aspect where these two VPN providers diverge significantly. McAfee Safe Connect stands out with its impressive network, hosting over (not stated) servers worldwide. This extensive coverage ensures that users almost anywhere can find a reliable and fast server connection. In contrast, ZoogVPN operates with a much smaller server fleet, consisting of just 71 servers in 42 countries.
The difference in server counts between the two VPNs might affect the performance and speed – especially if you are located in less covered regions. For users living in regions with fewer or no servers from ZoogVPN, this translate to higher latency (slower connection speeds). Also, the vast server network of McAfee Safe Connect not only provides better speed performance, but also typically allows for broader geographic reach (ie. bypassing geo-restrictions in streaming platforms).
No Logging Policy: ZoogVPN Better
The privacy policies of ZoogVPN and McAfee Safe Connect reveal a stark contrast.
ZoogVPN’s commitment to user privacy is reflected in its strict no-log policy. This policy is a critical feature for ensuring privacy, as it means the VPN service does not keep logs of user activities, including browsing history, IP addresses, and session times on their servers. The only data it does store is the user’s email address and bandwidth usage, which is a common practice for most VPN services.
McAfee Safe Connect, while offering a range of features and based in United States, does not follow a no-logging policy. This means that it might keep some records of user activities – which can be a significant concern for those who prioritize anonymity and data security.
If you value rigorous privacy standards and external validation of security claims, this can be a deal-breaker between the two VPN providers.
Money Back Guarantee: McAfee Safe Connect Better
When comparing their customer refund policy – McAfee Safe Connect offers a substantial sense of security with a 30-day money-back guarantee. This allows you plenty of time to evaluate McAfee Safe Connect’s features and customer supports before jumping in long term.
Conversely, ZoogVPN proposes a much shorter duration (7 days) for its money-back guarantee. Although this briefer period still presents a chance to test the service, it could be a factor for users who prefer an extended trial to thoroughly try out the VPN services for their specific requirements.
Unblock Streaming Platforms: ZoogVPN Better
ZoogVPN excels in bypassing geo-restrictions on most streaming platforms, including Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime. This allows its users to consistently enjoy their preferred shows and movies from virtually any location.
Conversely, McAfee Safe Connect faces challenges when it comes to this aspect. Despite having servers in 23 countries, McAfee Safe Connect struggles to bypass the geo-blocks imposed by major streaming platforms. This limitation is of paramount importance for users who prioritize seamless access to streaming content and are in search of a VPN service capable of effectively circumventing geo-restrictions.
Kill Switch Feature: ZoogVPN Better
The presence of a kill switch in a VPN service is a critical factor for many users. ZoogVPN includes this feature, which automatically cuts your internet connection if the VPN drops, preventing data leaks.
In comparison, McAfee Safe Connect does not offer a kill switch. The lack of this security feature could be a significant drawback for users who require an assurance of continuous privacy protection.
Bottomline
In conclusion, ZoogVPN and McAfee Safe Connect cater to different user needs and preferences. Users prioritizing privacy, streaming capabilities, and a kill switch feature may find ZoogVPN more suitable, while those seeking a broader server coverage and longer money-back guarantee might prefer McAfee Safe Connect.
Pick What You Need
Our VPN recommendations and ratings are just a general guide and may not match your personal needs. Know what you need and pick a VPN that fits. It’s crucial to assess your personal requirements, whether it’s enhanced security, better privacy, faster speeds, or access to specific content. Use ourZoogVPN and McAfee Safe Connect comparison as a starting point, but ultimately, select a VPN that aligns with your unique needs. This approach ensures you get the most out of your VPN service.
About ZoogVPN & McAfee Safe Connect
McAfee Safe Connect
McAfee, a well-established name in the cybersecurity industry, offers McAfee Safe Connect VPN. Founded in 1987 by John McAfee, the company is headquartered in San Jose, California, USA. McAfee Safe Connect VPN focuses on providing secure Wi-Fi connections and protecting user privacy. The service is compatible with Windows, Mac, iOS, and Android devices.
To learn more, read our McAfee Safe Connect review.
ZoogVPN
ZoogVPN is a virtual private network company that was established in 2013 by Zoog Services IKE company. The company is headquartered in Patras, Greece; and they specialize in providing secure and private internet connections to their clients.
To learn more, read our ZoogVPN review.