X-VPN vs Turbo VPN: Pricing & Key Features Comparisons

X-VPN vs Turbo VPN: Which VPN service is better? Compare the two VPNs in pricing, security features, and user experience. Choose what’s best for your needs.

Intro & Overall Ratings

Our Ratings

67.5%

53.2%

X-VPN and Turbo VPN are both reliable VPN services, offering similar features and functionalities. X-VPN, based in Hong Kong, holds an overall rating of 67.5% and Turbo VPN, based in Singapore, has a rating of 53.2%. Both VPNs offer AES-256 encryption and support for multiple protocols. They also allow up to 5 simultaneous connections. X-VPN offers 8,000 servers across 65 countries, while Turbo VPN provides a larger server network of 21,000 servers spread over 50 countries. Turbo VPN offers a lower monthly price at $3.75, compared to X-VPN’s $4.79 for a 12-month subscription. Neither of the VPNs have a logging policy. Both VPNs offer a 30-day money-back guarantee. However, while X-VPN does not provide split tunneling and Smart DNS, Turbo VPN does. Considering these factors, Turbo VPN seems to be a better choice for users prioritizing cost and additional features like split tunneling and Smart DNS.

About Our VPN Rating Systems

Our reviews delve deeply into each VPN service, scrutinizing aspects such as privacy, customer feedback, pricing, and usability to provide well-rounded insights.

Ratings are based on our comprehensive research of 96 VPN companies. Out of 96 VPNs we reviewed, only 11 surpass the 75% threshold in our evaluation, while half of the reviewed services score below average (54.1%).

Why Read Our VPN Guide?

  1. Our VPN reviews are unbiased and data-driven. We are not affiliated to any of the VPN companies listed on this website.
  2. Our rating system covers diverse user needs. We delve deeply into each VPN service, scrutinizing aspects such as privacy, customer feedback, pricing, and usability to provide well-rounded insights.

Specifications: X-VPN vs Turbo VPN

VPN Company X-VPN Turbo VPN
Jurisdiction Country Hong Kong Singapore
Cheapest Price $4.79/mo over 12-month subscription $3.75/mo
Monthly Price $11.99 $11.99
Money Back Guarantee 30 days 30 days
No Logging Policy? No No
Encryption AES-256 AES-256
Protocols L2TP/IPSec, OpenVPN, Everest Protocol IKEv2/IPSec, L2TP/IPSec, OpenVPN, and SSR
Servers 8,000 21,000
Servers Countries 65 50
Simultaneous Connections 5 devices 5 devices
Works in China? Unlikely Unlikely
Smart DNS No Yes
Kill Switch Yes Yes
Browser Extension Yes Yes
Double VPN No No
Ads Blocking No No
Split Tunneling No Yes
Third Party Audit 0
Customer Support 24/7 Live Chat & Email 24/7 Live Chat, and Email
Android App Yes Yes
iOS App Yes Yes
Unblock Streaming Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, Netflix, Hulu, and HBO Netflix
Learn More Visit Online Visit Online

Cruical Features & Key Differences

Plans & Pricing: Tie

For those on the hunt for a VPN that delivers both in terms of value and functionality, X-VPN and Turbo VPN are standout choices.

Turbo VPN’s service begins at $3.75/mo for 24-month subscription. X-VPN costs $11.99 a month when you subscribe on month-by-month basis and costs just $4.79 per month when you go with annual subscription.

Turbo VPN Plans

Turbo VPN Price Page

X-VPN Plans

X-VPN Price Page

Jurisdiction: Turbo VPN Better

The headquarters location of a VPN company is not just a geographical factor but a pivotal aspect that defines the legal framework within which a VPN operates.

Different countries have varying regulations regarding data retention, surveillance, and the extent to which government authorities can demand access to user data. For instance, companies based in countries that are part of the 14 Eyes surveillance alliance might be legally obligated to collect and share user data with government agencies. Conversely, a VPN company headquartered in a country with strong privacy laws and no mandatory data retention requirements (ie. Panama, British Virgin Islands, etc) can offer greater assurances of user privacy and data security.

Based in Hong Kong and Singapore, both X-VPN and Turbo VPN offer the significant advantage of being based outside the 14-Eye Alliance*. Both VPNs are not legally obligated to collect and share user data with (especially European and America) government agencies.

However, Hong Kong has undergone significant changes under the influence of China and its legal system, particularly since the implementation of the National Security Law in 2020. This law’s ambiguous nature allows for wide-ranging interpretations and enables authorities to potentially access personal data and monitor online activities more intrusively. Furthermore, the legal integration with mainland China means that data collected in Hong Kong could be subject to China’s stringent cybersecurity laws, which include mandatory data retention and sharing with government authorities.

In contrast, Singapore comes with strong privacy regulation and less intrusive data retention laws; and therefore, allows Turbo VPN to offer a lower risk of government-led surveillance and higher degree of user privacy. Hence, for those dealing with sensitive data or in strict online environments, Turbo VPN represents a safer choice.

Servers Count & Geographical Coverage: Tie

The size of a VPN’s server fleet plays a crucial role in determining user experience. A larger fleet generally provides faster speeds, greater reliability, wider geographical coverage, lower latency, and potentially enhanced privacy. On the other hand, a smaller server fleet might lead to slower speeds, higher latency, limited content access, and potential privacy concerns.

Fortunately, both X-VPN and Turbo VPN stand out with their extensive server networks. With X-VPN, users benefit from an expansive of 8,000 server network, facilitating connections from 65 countries. Turbo VPN mirrors this capability, boasting a sizeable server fleet of 21,000 servers spread over 50 countries. The broad reach of both X-VPN and Turbo VPN means that they are capable of providing dependable and swift connections for users globally and ensuring a smooth and speedy online experience

No Logging Policy: Turbo VPN Better

There is a significant difference in user privacy and data security whencomparing the two VPN companies’ no-logging policty. Turbo VPN’s no-log policy ensures that users’ online activities, including browsing history, IP addresses, and bandwidth usage, are not recorded; thereby offering a higher level of privacy and security. In comparison, X-VPN does not adhere to a no-logging policy. This implies that the company might retain certain records of user activities, a matter of considerable concern for individuals who prioritize anonymity and data security.

For users who prioritize robust privacy standards and seek external verification of security claims, these distinctions may prove pivotal in selecting the most suitable VPN service.

Money Back Guarantee: Tie

Both X-VPN and Turbo VPN reassures its users with a lengthy money-back guarantee*, allowing ample time to test their services thoroughly. These guarantees are more than just policies; they are strong indicators of the confidence that both services have in the quality they offer. This assurance provides users with a risk-free opportunity to immerse themselves in the diverse features of each VPN. From the vast server network of X-VPN to the advanced security protocols of Turbo VPN – you have the liberty to thoroughly evaluate each service before deciding on a long-term investment.

* According to our market study, the average money-back guarantee period in the industry is approximately 25.68 days.

Bottomline

To sum up and conclude, both X-VPN and Turbo VPN provide extensive server networks, competitive pricing, and robust features. However, users prioritizing privacy and data security should lean towards Turbo VPN due to its no-logging policy and stronger jurisdictional privacy laws, while those seeking a wider geographical server coverage may find X-VPN more suitable.

Pick What You Need

Our VPN recommendations and ratings are just a general guide and may not match your personal needs. Know what you need and pick a VPN that fits. It’s crucial to assess your personal requirements, whether it’s enhanced security, better privacy, faster speeds, or access to specific content. Use ourX-VPN and Turbo VPN comparison as a starting point, but ultimately, select a VPN that aligns with your unique needs. This approach ensures you get the most out of your VPN service.

About X-VPN & Turbo VPN

Turbo VPN

More about Turbo VPN

Turbo VPN belongs to Innovative Connecting; a Singapore-based tech company focused on the mobile app development space. Details are a little sketchy about the company. All of this information (or lack of it) should raise a ton of red flags for any VPN service. Yet Turbo VPN isn’t done being an oddity with that alone, and this review will walk you through the details. I advise great caution should you be considering this VPN service

To learn more, read our Turbo VPN review.

X-VPN

More about X-VPN

X-VPN is a virtual private network (VPN) company established in 2017. It was founded by Daniel Lee who has over 10 years of experience in the internet and security industry. The company headquarters is based in the Hong Kong, but it has operations worldwide. X-VPN provides a secure and private internet browsing experience for its users while preserving their anonymity and data privacy. X-VPN offers different subscription plans. The cheapest plan starts at $4.79/mo and require a 12-month commitment.

To learn more, read our X-VPN review.

Find Best VPN for Different Purposes

Get Data-Driven VPN Reviews

VyperVPN Review

Plans start at $5.00
Our Rating (%):42.2

Unlocator VPN Review

Plans start at $4.99
Our Rating (%):30.6

Hotbot VPN Review

Plans start at $4.87
Our Rating (%):49.3

Trust.Zone VPN Review

Plans start at $1.99
Our Rating (%):69.1

Smart DNS Proxy Review

Plans start at $2.48
Our Rating (%):62.8

AirVPN Review

Plans start at $1.96
Our Rating (%):39.1

SurfEasy VPN Review

Plans start at $2.49
Our Rating (%):39.0

SlickVPN Review

Plans start at $4
Our Rating (%):22.0

NordVPN Review

Plans start at $2.99
Our Rating (%):83.5